"; *==== dynamic connectionist representation ====*           " 0 0
"; describes the simplest account of competition between      " 0 0
"; psychotherapy and social rehabilitation                    " 0 0
0 1 7

" ; we hypothesize that                                                     " 0 0
" ; actions of the body, e.g. production of cortisol,                       " 0 0 
" ; adrenilin, etc.  associated with affect, influence                      " 0 0 
" ; the activation of neurons                                               " 0 0
" ; But, we wish to first model coherence based reasoning independent       " 0 0
" ; of emotional influences. So, there are no pathways by way of which      " 0 0
" ; valence may flow in this example.                                       " 0 0
5 0 "AFFECTIVE influence"
10 0 ""

" ; two theories are to be entertained                                      " 0 0
8 0 2

" ; we hypothesize that                                                     " 0 0
" ; if there is an independent world, that world will                       " 0 0
" ; influence the activation of neurons                                     " 0 0
" ; if there is no independent world, a story needs to be                   " 0 0
" ; told about what source provides this degree of input                    " 0 0
" ; perhaps it is the influence of god or angels                            " 0 0
5 1 "WORLD influence"
10 1 ""

" ; the model is silent on the ontological status of perceptions            " 0 0
" ; materialist may interpret in a topic neutral way                        " 0 0
" ; dualist and epiphenomenalist may see qualia here                        " 0 0
" ; in any case this collection of nodes is excited when instances of       " 0 0
" ; their corresponding object types are present                            " 0 0
" ; This is the the data, evidence, or observation to be accounted for      " 0 0
5 2 "Exemplary THERAPY 2"
10 2 ""

" ; ============= Hypotheses of initil Theory ==================            " 0 0
" ; These nodes represent elements of Theory one                            " 0 0
5 3 "ID 3"
10 3 "T1"
5 4 "EGO 4"
10 4 "T1"
5 5 "SUPER-EGO 5"
10 5 "T1"
5 6 "TRANSFERENCE 6"
10 6 "T1"
5 7 "COUNTER-TRANSFERENCE 7"
10 7 "T1"

" ;  ============== coherence relations                                    " 0 0
" ;  co-hypotheses of a theory share the weight of their relevance         " 0 0
" ;  nodes 3, 4, and 5 together explain Evidence node 2                    " 0 0
7 2 3
7 2 4
7 2 5
" ; nodes 6 and 7 are auxilary hypotheses that help to account for node 2  " 0 0
7 2 6
7 2 7
" ;  nodes 6, and 7 together explain only on the assumption of 3, 4, 5     " 0 0
7 6 3
7 6 4
7 6 5

7 7 3
7 7 4
7 7 5

" ; =========== positive links between nodes of initial theory             " 0 0
1 1 2
1 2 3
1 2 4
1 2 5
1 2 6
1 2 7
1 3 4
1 3 5
1 3 6
1 3 7
1 4 5
1 4 6
1 4 7
1 5 6
1 5 7
1 6 7

" ; ========== negative links between nodes of competing hypotheses        " 0 0
2 8 3
2 8 4
2 8 5
2 8 6
2 8 7

" ; ============ Alternative Hypotheses ===========                        " 0 0
5 8 "ENVIRONMENT ADJUSTMENTS 8"
10 8 "T2"

" ;  ============== coherence relations                                    " 0 0
" ;  nodes 8 explains Evidence node 2                                      " 0 0
7 2 8

" ; =========== positive links between nodes of alternative theory          " 0 0
1 2 8