" ;*==== dynamic connectionist representation ====*" 0 0 " ; Is there something about Harry? " 0 0 0 1 21 " ; we hypothesize that " 0 0 " ; actions of the body, e.g. production of cortisol, " 0 0 " ; adrenilin, etc. associated with affect, influence " 0 0 " ; the activation of neurons " 0 0 5 0 "AFFECTIVE influence" " ; we hypothesize that " 0 0 " ; if there is an independent world, that world will " 0 0 " ; influence the activation of neurons " 0 0 " ; if there is no independent world, a story needs to be " 0 0 " ; told about what source provides this degree of input " 0 0 " ; perhaps it is the influence of god or angels " 0 0 5 1 "WORLD influence" " ; the model is silent on the ontological status of perceptions " 0 0 " ; materialist may interpret in a topic neutral way " 0 0 " ; dualist and epiphenomenalist may see qualia here " 0 0 " ; in any case this collection of nodes is excited when instances of " 0 0 " ; their corresponding object types are present " 0 0 5 2 "available psycho-therapy perception-interface 2" 5 3 "available social-rehabilitation perception-interface 3" " ; Harry first learns about psycho-therapy only by smell and about social-rehabilitation only by sight . " 0 0 " ; Consequently bundles of neurons that are responsible for optical processing " 0 0 " ; are activated in response to each instance of an experience or thought " 0 0 " ; associated with the relevant corresponding object type learned by way of sight. " 0 0 5 4 "training context: the field. social-rehabilitation by sight 4" 5 22 "University context 22" 10 22 "T3 Therapy" 1 1 22 1 13 22 " ; Harry first learns about psycho-therapy only by smell. " 0 0 " ; consequently bundles of neurons that are responsible for auoral processing " 0 0 " ; are activated in response to each instance of an experience or thought " 0 0 " ; associated with the relevant corresponding object type learned by way of smell. " 0 0 5 5 "training context: the office psycho-therapy by smell 5" " ; linguistic, logical, and other conceptual representations are created " 0 0 " ; and activated in other areas of the brain as a consequence of " 0 0 " ; repeated experiences " 0 0 5 6 " re:'psycho-therapy' concept 6" " ; ============= Hypotheses of initil Theory ================== " 0 0 " ; These nodes represent elements of Theory one node 3=17 4=18 5=19 6=20 7=21 " 0 0 5 17 "ID 17" 10 17 "T1 psycho-therapy" 5 18 "EGO 18" 10 18 "T1 psycho-therapy" 5 19 "SUPER-EGO 19" 10 19 "T1 psycho-therapy" 5 20 "TRANSFERENCE 20" 10 20 "T1 psycho-therapy" 5 21 "COUNTER-TRANSFERENCE 21" 10 21 "T1 psycho-therapy" " ; ---------------- links to available perception-interface/possible training-experiences and training-contexts " 0 0 1 17 2 1 17 5 1 18 2 1 18 5 1 19 2 1 19 5 1 20 2 1 20 5 1 21 2 1 21 5 " ; =========== positive links between nodes of initial theory " 0 0 1 17 18 1 17 19 1 17 20 1 17 21 1 18 19 1 18 20 1 18 21 1 19 20 1 19 21 1 20 21 1 6 17 1 6 18 1 6 19 1 6 20 1 6 21 5 7 " re:'social-rehabilitation' concept 7" " ; the Therapy class concept represents a quite complex neural bundle. " 0 0 " ; not only does this bundle associate individual instances of the " 0 0 " ; type 'Therapy' but is an abstract sortal for heirarchical processing " 0 0 5 12 "Therapy class concept 12" 1 12 7 1 12 6 1 1 2 1 1 3 1 2 5 1 3 4 1 6 2 1 6 5 1 3 7 1 4 7 " ; theory concepts cohere with therapy methods " 0 0 1 10 6 1 10 17 1 10 18 1 10 19 1 10 20 1 10 21 " ; the concepts social-rehabilitation and psycho-therapy compete as do the methods associated " 0 0 " ; with each respective concept " 0 0 2 6 7 " ; 2 10 11 line replaced by contridiction line further on " 0 0 2 17 7 2 18 7 2 19 7 2 20 7 2 21 7 2 11 17 2 11 18 2 11 19 2 11 20 2 11 21 2 7 10 " ; SMELLING social-rehabilitation SUPRESSES psycho-therapy SEEKING BEHAVIOR AND ACTIVATES " 0 0 " ; social-rehabilitation SEEKING BEHAVIOR .... AND VICE VERSA " 0 0 " ; this does not mean that absence of one is evidence for the other " 0 0 2 10 4 2 11 5 " ; -------------------------------------------------------------- " 0 0 "; with the addition of a categorical positive valence " 0 0 "; favoring prohibition of dual roles on moral grounds " 0 0 "; this simple bias assumes any social interaction is a " 0 0 "; dual role and so a negative link connects the valenced " 0 0 "; node to ENVIRONMENTAL ADJUSTMETS " 0 0 5 14 "no dual roles" 3 14 0.05 10 14 "" " ; change links to behaviors " 0 0 " ; 2 14 " 0 0 1 14 0 " ; We now introduce two additional kinds of bias, " 0 0 " ; practical values and methodological values " 0 0 5 15 "practical/expedient" 3 15 0.05 10 15 "" " ; change links to behaviors " 0 0 " ; 2 15 8 " 0 0 1 15 0 " ; on this interpretation, it is categorically imperative that " 0 0 " ; scientists act only within methods prescribed within their " 0 0 " ; paradigm. Therefore, interaction outside the methods " 0 0 " ; of psycho-therapy are negatively valued. " 0 0 5 16 "methodological" 3 16 0.05 10 16 "" " ; change links to behaviors " 0 0 " ; 2 16 8 " 0 0 1 16 0 " ; methods common to theories are valued " 0 0 1 16 13 " ; --------------------------------------------------------------- " 0 0 5 8 "Moved toward -> 8" 3 8 .05 1 0 8 " ; Harry wants to do whatever will provide Therapy " 0 0 1 8 13 " ; -------------------------------- " 0 0 " ; Harry comes toward the bar-ba-que and begins experiencing. " 0 0 " ; ---------------------------------- " 0 0 " ; ---------------------------------- " 0 0 " ; This excites his arual processing system neurons which connect " 0 0 " ; with Therapy concepts. He thinks, 'hmmmm Therapy.' But because he has " 0 0 " ; not learned all Therapys in the same way, only Therapy concepts he had " 0 0 " ; learned by smell get activated as a consequence of this initial " 0 0 " ; experience.(However, Therapy concepts and categories may have already " 0 0 " ; been established in connection with language learning via dthat.) " 0 0 " ; ============== coherence relations " 0 0 " ; co-hypotheses of a theory share the weight of their relevance " 0 0 " ; nodes 17, 18, and 19 together explain Evidence node 2 " 0 0 7 2 17 7 2 18 7 2 19 " ; nodes 20 and 21 are auxilary hypotheses that help to account for node 2 " 0 0 7 2 20 7 2 21 " ; nodes 20, and 21 together explain only on the assumption of 17, 18, 19 " 0 0 7 20 17 7 20 18 7 20 19 7 21 17 7 21 18 7 21 19 " ; node 7 explains 3 " 0 0 7 7 3 " ; expainations " 0 0 7 3 4 7 2 5 " ; psycho-therapy concepts 6 17 18 19 20 21 are explained in the office 5 and university training environment 22. " 0 0 7 5 6 7 5 17 7 5 18 7 5 19 7 5 20 7 5 21 7 5 22 1 5 22 " ; social-rehabilitation concepts 7 are explained in the field 4 and university training environment 22. " 0 0 7 4 7 7 4 22 1 4 22 " ; the methodologies undertaken by psycho-therapists 10 " 0 0 " ; are motivated my multiple theoretical concepts 6 17 18 19 20 21 " 0 0 7 10 6 7 10 17 7 10 18 7 10 19 7 10 20 7 10 21 " ; the methodologies undertaken by social-rehabilitationists " 0 0 " ; are motivated by a unitary theoretical concept " 0 0 7 11 7 " ; the psycho-therapy concept 6 is built from the theoretical entity components 17 18 19 20 21 " 0 0 7 6 17 7 6 18 7 6 19 7 6 20 7 6 21 " ; dthat is the neurology of ostension " 0 0 " ; dthat has two distinct roles, name-dthat and get-dthat " 0 0 " ; name-that is intimately connected to observation nodes " 0 0 " ; get-that is intimately connected to methods nodes. " 0 0 " ; we use dthat to capture neuronal activations associated with " 0 0 " ; tagging observations without attributing any properties to the " 0 0 " ; observation except that the subject observation is self-identical " 0 0 " ; and not another thing " 0 0 5 9 "dthat 9" " ; name-dthat is accomplished via links between dthat, some " 0 0 " ; observation, and concept nodes active in association with further " 0 0 " ; retrieval of the name " 0 0 1 9 7 1 9 6 1 9 12 " ; the above captures the ambiguity between social-rehabilitation, psycho-therapy, and Therapy " 0 0 " ; get-that, is accomplished via links between dthat, some " 0 0 " ; motor activating neurons such as move-towards, and observations " 0 0 1 9 2 1 9 3 1 9 8 " ; we will entertain three theories, Therapy, social-rehabilitation, and psycho-therapy. " 0 0 8 0 3 " ; collapsed into the following neural bundles are motor neurons " 0 0 " ; as well as complex strategies and proceedural knowledge " 0 0 5 10 "go method for psycho-therapy T1 10" 5 11 "go method for social-rehabilitation T2 11" 5 13 "common go method for Therapy 13" 1 10 13 1 11 13 1 12 13 " ; if the methods for investigating/consuming an observation competes " 0 0 " ; greatly with other methods in the network this will impact acceptance " 0 0 " ; or rejection of nodes elsewhere in the network. " 0 0 " ; the go methods for social-rehabilitation and the go methods of psycho-therapy contradict " 0 0 6 10 11 " ; here we mark neuronal bundles that may together represent theories " 0 0 " ; that cohere together or compete. So, we mark concept nodes and " 0 0 " ; methods nodes of the respective theories appropriately. " 0 0 " ; Evidence nodes may contribute to the acceptance of one or more " 0 0 " ; theories and so are not marked at belonging to a particular theory " 0 0 10 10 "T1 psycho-therapy" 10 11 "T2 social-rehabilitation" 10 6 "T1 psycho-therapy" 10 7 "T2 social-rehabilitation" 10 12 "T3 Therapy" 10 1 "" 10 2 "" 10 3 "" 10 4 "" 10 5 "" 10 8 "" 10 9 "" 1 11 7 1 8 10 1 8 11 1 10 12 1 11 12